Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

The NCAA Joke

December 24th 2010 01:29
Okay, let me get this straight, NCAA, it is not okay for players to sell championship rings, jerseys, and awards. But if you do choose to sell these items you can still play in your respective bowl game if you are chosen.

Five Ohio State football players were suspended for five games beginning next season. The five will be allowed to play in Ohio State's Sugar bowl game appearance with Arkansas, January fourth.

Terrell Pryor, Ohio State's do everything quarterback is included in the five. Running back Daniel Herron, wideout Devier Posey, offensive tackle Mike Adams, and defensive end Solomon Adams all were suspended. Now the likely thing for Pryor, Herron, Posey, and Adams to do is jump to the pros. They all would be selected in the draft, Pryor likely in the first round. All five will be seniors next season.


The Buckeyes players sold memorabila in exchange for tattoos at a local tattoo parlor. According to players they didn't know what they were doing was wrong.

Now, why do the players get suspended for five games and not the Sugar Bowl? According to NCAA, the players did not receive adequate rules education during the time the violations occurred.

So if the players play dumb, any violation the NCAA finds will be on layover or not even sanctioned, as evident with the Cam Newton situation earlier this year.

Last season, Reggie Bush had his Heisman Trophy taken away from him due to improper benefits being given to him. Why does the NCAA prompt this to happen, but yet okay Newton and the Ohio State players? Doesn't make sense. It's all a matter of making money for the advertisers who pay for their commercials in the BCS games. If Georgia Tech had the same violation for their Independence Bowl appearance, they would be suspended for that game and four more next season.


The NCAA is making a mockery of themselves. Time for consistent punishments.
49
Vote


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
3 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Rick Gillispie

December 24th 2010 03:28
Man Geek you beat me to it. I was going to write something about this.

Good article, you did a better job than i probably would have done.

Same complaints why do the get suspended but Cam doesn't. Why do the get to play in bowl game but not five games next season?

Makes no sense.

Comment by Joe Soriano

December 24th 2010 06:34
I get the punishment about not suspending them for the Sugar Bowl. They don't want to make too big deal out of it and change the outcome of an important Bowl Game. I get it, and I really don't care what the NCAA does at this point. I lost my interest in collegiate athletics a long time ago, and those four letters were a big reason.

Comment by Aryan Von Eicken

December 24th 2010 19:21
Yeah that would not be smart to suspend them from the bowls. I think it is actually to harsh that they suspended them for 5 games next year. I think 3 would have been enough.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
22 Posts
20 Posts
18 Posts
718 Posts dating from September 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

gpike's Blogs

10411 Vote(s)
43 Comment(s)
328 Post(s)
Moderated by gpike
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]